Search

Deplorables Republic

Freedom of speech for a free people

Category

False Flag Attacks

It is TIME for America to revise the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952

It is TIME for America to revise the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, also known as the McCarran-Walter Act. (H.R. 5678) 

This is what I call being prepared. Notice the flag in the background. This is Israel 2017, where teachers carry CAR-15’s, where it’s mandatory that young people serve in the military and they are armed 24/7, where they eat right and don’t over-medicate, where the murder rate for the whole country is a fraction of what Nashville Tennessee is. Where nationalism & patriotism is center stage.

Where parents teach respect and values instead of letting Disney and X-Box raise their children, where they stand for their flag and would defend it with their lives!

WAKE UP AMERICA! WE DON’T HAVE A GUN PROBLEM WE HAVE A LIBERAL PROBLEM!

And as long as we allow leftists to have a voice it will get worse, so get prepared!

It is TIME for America to outlaw leftism in its many forms: socialism, communism, Nazism; and to revise and deploy the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, also known as the McCarran-Walter Act. (H.R. 5678) 

It is TIME to outlaw radical Islam in all of its forms, (it is ALL radical) as it  is in complete opposition to every tenet of the U.S. Constitution.

Speaking in the Senate on March 2, 1953, Senator Pat McCarran (D-Nevada), said:

“I believe that this nation is the last hope of Western civilization and if this oasis of the world shall be overrun, perverted, contaminated or destroyed, then the last flickering light of humanity will be extinguished. I take no issue with those who would praise the contributions which have been made to our society by people of many races, of varied creeds and colors. However, we have in the United States today hard-core, indigestible blocs which have not become integrated into the American way of life, but which, on the contrary are its deadly enemies.

Today, as never before, untold millions are storming our gates for admission and those gates are cracking under the strain. The solution of the problems of Europe and Asia will not come through a transplanting of those problems en masse to the United States.

I do not intend to become prophetic, but if the enemies of this legislation succeed in riddling it to pieces, or in amending it beyond recognition, they will have contributed more to promote this nation’s downfall than any other group since we achieved our independence as a nation.”

H.R. 5678 was named after its sponsors who were BOTH Democrats; Senators Pat McCarran (D-Nevada), and Congressman Francis Walter (D-Pennsylvania) and were apparently the last two living Democrats with a high IQ and any common sense.

South Carolina citizens demanding changes in “No Gun Zones” laws

Round 1 (Ding- Ding!) South Carolina citizens demanding changes in “No Gun Zones” laws

Cease and Desist —–

Due to public schools being labeled “No Gun Zones”, we, as parents are unable to protect our children at school, South Carolina enforces this statute. When enforcing this law, it removes the most basic right of all human life- the right to survival, as well as the inherent right to protect ourselves, as well as our children.

Further, where any institution removes the duty of care from an individual; both expressly through legislation, or implied through conduct, it takes the duty of care in the absence of the parents.  The duty of care is a legal duty on all individuals and organizations to avoid carelessly causing injury to persons. It requires everything ‘reasonably practicable’ be done to protect the health and safety of our children in public school.

In addition, this breach of duty of care extends to the public school teachers, as well. Whenever a student teacher relationship exists, the teacher has a special duty of care. This is a legal obligation to protect students from injury;
“A teacher is to take such measures as are reasonable in the circumstances to protect a student under the teachers charge from the risks of injury that the teacher could have reasonably foreseen.” (Richards v State of Victoria, 1969)

As part of that duty, teachers are required to supervise students adequately. This requires not only protection from known hazards, but also from those that could arise (those that the teacher could have easily foreseen) and against which preventative measures could have been taken.

• Teachers in breach of duty of care may be liable for injuries inflicted by one student on another, as well as the injuries sustained by the student.

• For a teacher or a school to be held guilty of negligence, it must be proved that the injury was foreseeable result of the action or lack of action. In courts this test is not a demanding one.

• In situations where the teacher should reasonably have foreseen the possibility of injury, the teacher has a duty to take reasonable care.

• The teacher’s duty of care will have a higher expectation as the child’s age is lower.

• Schools are bound by standards which are issued under legislative authority, non compliance with these standards may amount to negligence.

Primary factors to consider in ascertaining whether the person’s conduct lacks reasonable care are the foreseeable likelihood that the person’s conduct will result in harm, the foreseeable severity of any harm that may ensue, and the burden of precautions to eliminate or reduce the risk of harm. See Restatement (Third) of Torts: Liability for Physical Harm § 3 (P.F.D. No. 1, 2005).

Further, negligent conduct may consist of either an act, or an omission to act when there is a duty to do so.  See Restatement (Second) of Torts § 282 (1965).
Four elements are required to establish a prima facie case of negligence:

the existence of a legal duty that the defendant owed to the plaintiff
defendant’s breach of that duty
plaintiff’s sufferance of an injury
proof that defendant’s breach caused the injury (typically defined through proximate cause)
Without regard to the laws of man which protect property, under the law of nature, all people have an inherent right to live, as well as the unalienable right to protect that life.

“Under the law of nature, all men are born free, everyone comes into the world with a right to his own person, which includes the liberty of moving and using it at his own. This is what is called personal liberty, and is given him by the author of nature, because necessary for his own sustenance.”
– Legal argument in the case of Howell vs. Netherland, April 1770; “The Works of Thomas Jefferson,” Federal Edition, Editor: Paul Leicester Ford, (New York and London, G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1904-5) Vol. 1.

We demand you that you immediately Cease and Desist the enforcement of conceal carry weapons on public school property, as well as the inherent right of parents who, by providing transportation, have an inherent right to defend both their self and their children on public school property.

Related Video:

URGENT: Stasi State, Mental Health & the details of the DRILL!

The Broward Sheriff Israel is calling for expanding “LAW” enforcement authority to DETAIN civilians for general concerns about “mental well-being” This is a STASI tactic. We’ve been neglecting the critical details about these mass carnage events and it’s time to circle back around and demand some answers.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: