It is TIME for America to revise the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, also known as the McCarran-Walter Act. (H.R. 5678)
This is what I call being prepared. Notice the flag in the background. This is Israel 2017, where teachers carry CAR-15’s, where it’s mandatory that young people serve in the military and they are armed 24/7, where they eat right and don’t over-medicate, where the murder rate for the whole country is a fraction of what Nashville Tennessee is. Where nationalism & patriotism is center stage.
Where parents teach respect and values instead of letting Disney and X-Box raise their children, where they stand for their flag and would defend it with their lives!
WAKE UP AMERICA! WE DON’T HAVE A GUN PROBLEM WE HAVE A LIBERAL PROBLEM!
And as long as we allow leftists to have a voice it will get worse, so get prepared!
It is TIME for America to outlaw leftism in its many forms: socialism, communism, Nazism; and to revise and deploy the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, also known as the McCarran-Walter Act. (H.R. 5678)
It is TIME to outlaw radical Islam in all of its forms, (it is ALL radical) as it is in complete opposition to every tenet of the U.S. Constitution.
Speaking in the Senate on March 2, 1953, Senator Pat McCarran (D-Nevada), said:
“I believe that this nation is the last hope of Western civilization and if this oasis of the world shall be overrun, perverted, contaminated or destroyed, then the last flickering light of humanity will be extinguished. I take no issue with those who would praise the contributions which have been made to our society by people of many races, of varied creeds and colors. However, we have in the United States today hard-core, indigestible blocs which have not become integrated into the American way of life, but which, on the contrary are its deadly enemies.
Today, as never before, untold millions are storming our gates for admission and those gates are cracking under the strain. The solution of the problems of Europe and Asia will not come through a transplanting of those problems en masse to the United States.
I do not intend to become prophetic, but if the enemies of this legislation succeed in riddling it to pieces, or in amending it beyond recognition, they will have contributed more to promote this nation’s downfall than any other group since we achieved our independence as a nation.”
H.R. 5678 was named after its sponsors who were BOTH Democrats; Senators Pat McCarran (D-Nevada), and Congressman Francis Walter (D-Pennsylvania) and were apparently the last two living Democrats with a high IQ and any common sense.
Only you, our readers can bring this pertinent information to the attention of the American people. We conservatives are fed-up with the false narrative being spread by the Democrat talking heads calling us Nazis. Please SHARE this information via all of your social networking websites including Facebook and twitter; as well as send the story link to all of your friends via e-mail.
Let’s talk about the elephant in the room, the *number of firearms deaths in the U.S. since 1968 vs. the *number of abortion deaths since 1973 when Roe vs. Wade was enacted.
The *death toll from all firearms, 1968 to 2016 (estimated) is 1,581,943. This number includes ALL deaths whether accidental, suicide, and homicide.
In 34 years of mass shootings since 1982, there have been only 634 deaths by mass shootings. That number pales to the number of murders by abortion since Roe vs. Wade was enacted 45 years ago in 1973.
*The number of deaths from fatal car crashes averages around 33,000 a year in the United States, but we don’t blame cars for the carnage do we?
Let’s look at the facts: In 45 years since abortion was legalized, over 60 MILLION defenseless, innocent children have been murdered by scalpels, the preferred weapon of choice used by liberals. Why aren’t Americans up in arms about making scalpels illegal?
*statistics from the CDC (Centers for Disease Control)
If you lined-up every person who was aborted since Roe vs. Wade was enacted (Over 60 MILLION)….
Now lets assume there are people of all sizes and each person measures 2 feet, now add 6 inches it becomes 30 inches from person to person, shoulder to shoulder.
The line would be 1,800,000,000 inches long. This would account for 150,000,000 feet. This would equal 28,409 miles. (if my mathematical calculations are correct.) The line would circle the globe and then some. (Over 4,000 miles more.)
This is how long the line of people would stretch (and then some) if you lined-up every person who has been the victim of an abortion since Roe vs. Wade was enacted in 1973.
It is 2,668.7 miles from Washington, DC to Los Angeles, California. The equatorial circumference of Earth is about 24,900 miles. However, from pole-to-pole — the meridional circumference — Earth is only 24,812 miles.
Now let’s consider the annual number of deaths by doctors in the U.S.
“Through their analysis of four other studies examining death rate information, the doctors estimate there are at least 251,454 deaths due to medical errors annually in the United States. The authors believe the number is actually much higher, as home and nursing home deaths are not counted in that total.” ~ source:CNN
And Liberals say conservatives are Nazis? They are actually using a Nazi tactic in which they accuse their opposition of that which they themselves are guilty of!
Liberal “progressive” socialists have MURDEREDmore people in the United States ALONE since 1973 than were killed in the Holocaust; more people than were MURDERED by Stalin when he murdered 20 MILLION of his own countrymen during and after the Bolshevik Revolution.
Think about that the next time you hear some liberal crybaby talk about gun control and say we don’t care about America’s children!
7 Quotes That Prove Adolf Hitler Was A Proud Socialist
(Reproduced here in an easier-to-follow format than on the original post)
#1. “I have learned a great deal from Marxism” … “as I do not hesitate to admit”
Hitler may have publicly denounced Marxism, because of his war against the hated Soviet Union, but privatelyhe always admittedthat he was at heart a left-winger. He once said to Otto Wagener that the problem with the politicians of the Weimar Republic was that they “had never even read Marx.” He believed that the problem of German Communists was that they didn’t understand the difference between principles and tactics. He referred to them as mere pamphleteers, whereas “I have put into practice what these peddlers and pen pushers have timidly begun.” He stated plainly that “the whole of National Socialism” was based on Marx.
#2. [My task is to] “convert the German volk (people) to socialism without simply killing off the old individualists”
Hitlerwanted to usethe old classical liberal class, the entrepreneurs and the individualist’s resources to build socialism in Germany. Socialism is defined technically as public ownership of the means of production, and instead of doing what Stalin did and purge the capitalists, he committed himself instead to simply confiscating their capital. The economy could easily be controlled simply by dispossessing the capitalist class of their means of production, and guiding their productive capacity through the hands of the state.
#3. “If we are socialists, then we must definitely be anti-semites – and the opposite, in that case, is Materialism and Mammonism, which we seek to oppose.” “How, as a socialist, can you not be an anti-semite?”
In a speech in Munich in August 1920, Hitler addressed the National Socialist party on the issues of race and politics. It was widely known that socialists of the time were tied to eugenic policies, as they have throughout history. Indeed, everyone who supported genocide at that time also called themselves socialists
#4. We must “find and travel the road from individualism to socialism without revolution”.
Speaking to his associate, Hitler argued that the problem with Russian Communism was that they had chosen their path as a revolutionary one. If individualism was to be destroyed, revolution was the most painful and difficult way to destroy the capitalists. Marx and Lenin had the right goals in his mind, but simply chose the wrong tactics.
#5. “Why need we trouble to socialize banks and factories? We socialize human beings.”
Hitler’sidea of national unitywas to take socialism directly to the people. He wanted socialism to not just be about nationalizing industry, but nationalizing the people themselves. The people are the servants of the state, and socialism was the solution to all of society’s ills.
#6. “We are socialists, we are enemies of today’s capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions” 1927
Does it really get any more clear than this? Hitlerstated plainlythat he was an enemy of capitalism.
#7. “What Marxism, Leninism and Stalinism failed to accomplish we shall be in a position to achieve.”
Hitlerwas merelyan unorthodox socialist. Again, he believed that the problems of his predecessors were simply tactical, not philosophical.
Round 1 (Ding- Ding!) South Carolina citizens demanding changes in “No Gun Zones” laws
Cease and Desist —–
Due to public schools being labeled “No Gun Zones”, we, as parents are unable to protect our children at school, South Carolina enforces this statute. When enforcing this law, it removes the most basic right of all human life- the right to survival, as well as the inherent right to protect ourselves, as well as our children.
Further, where any institution removes the duty of care from an individual; both expressly through legislation, or implied through conduct, it takes the duty of care in the absence of the parents. The duty of care is a legal duty on all individuals and organizations to avoid carelessly causing injury to persons. It requires everything ‘reasonably practicable’ be done to protect the health and safety of our children in public school.
In addition, this breach of duty of care extends to the public school teachers, as well. Whenever a student teacher relationship exists, the teacher has a special duty of care. This is a legal obligation to protect students from injury; “A teacher is to take such measures as are reasonable in the circumstances to protect a student under the teachers charge from the risks of injury that the teacher could have reasonably foreseen.” (Richards v State of Victoria, 1969)
As part of that duty, teachers are required to supervise students adequately. This requires not only protection from known hazards, but also from those that could arise (those that the teacher could have easily foreseen) and against which preventative measures could have been taken.
• Teachers in breach of duty of care may be liable for injuries inflicted by one student on another, as well as the injuries sustained by the student.
• For a teacher or a school to be held guilty of negligence, it must be proved that the injury was foreseeable result of the action or lack of action. In courts this test is not a demanding one.
• In situations where the teacher should reasonably have foreseen the possibility of injury, the teacher has a duty to take reasonable care.
• The teacher’s duty of care will have a higher expectation as the child’s age is lower.
• Schools are bound by standards which are issued under legislative authority, non compliance with these standards may amount to negligence.
Primary factors to consider in ascertaining whether the person’s conduct lacks reasonable care are the foreseeable likelihood that the person’s conduct will result in harm, the foreseeable severity of any harm that may ensue, and the burden of precautions to eliminate or reduce the risk of harm. See Restatement (Third) of Torts: Liability for Physical Harm § 3 (P.F.D. No. 1, 2005).
Further, negligent conduct may consist of either an act, or an omission to act when there is a duty to do so. See Restatement (Second) of Torts § 282 (1965). Four elements are required to establish a prima facie case of negligence:
the existence of a legal duty that the defendant owed to the plaintiff defendant’s breach of that duty plaintiff’s sufferance of an injury proof that defendant’s breach caused the injury (typically defined through proximate cause) Without regard to the laws of man which protect property, under the law of nature, all people have an inherent right to live, as well as the unalienable right to protect that life.
“Under the law of nature, all men are born free, everyone comes into the world with a right to his own person, which includes the liberty of moving and using it at his own. This is what is called personal liberty, and is given him by the author of nature, because necessary for his own sustenance.” – Legal argument in the case of Howell vs. Netherland, April 1770; “The Works of Thomas Jefferson,” Federal Edition, Editor: Paul Leicester Ford, (New York and London, G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1904-5) Vol. 1.
We demand you that you immediately Cease and Desist the enforcement of conceal carry weapons on public school property, as well as the inherent right of parents who, by providing transportation, have an inherent right to defend both their self and their children on public school property.
URGENT: Stasi State, Mental Health & the details of the DRILL!
The Broward Sheriff Israel is calling for expanding “LAW” enforcement authority to DETAIN civilians for general concerns about “mental well-being” This is a STASI tactic. We’ve been neglecting the critical details about these mass carnage events and it’s time to circle back around and demand some answers.
I’m really surprised this post hasn’t gone viral yet. The title is hilarious, but true. I don’t post articles like this to entertain people, I post them hoping you will #Share them and Tweet them. Please go to the bottom of this blog and Share it to all of your social networks and copy & paste this message in its’ entirety and post it on your Facebook profiles; as well as on all of the high-membership Trump groups. Alternately, you may also paste it into an e-mail and send it to all of your contacts.
Control The Moron Population: Spay & Neuter Your Liberals
I would seriously like to see this shared at least 500,000 times. The title is hilarious, but the message needs to be read by millions of people. We can do this with YOUR help!
P.S. Over 70% of all prison inmates in the United States who have committed violent crimes have been registered Democrats, NOT conservatives or NRA members.
The answer to curbing gun violence in the United States is to prohibit the ownership of firearms to anyone who has ever registered to vote as a Democrat. The Las Vegas shooter was a registered Democrat.
Over 80% of all prison inmates in the United States are African-Americans and it is mostly because of black-on-black violence, not because they are black. The race card doesn’t work here.
In this incredible true story we take a look at a man who had to do the unthinkable. He had to put himself in immediate life threatening danger to save his life, the lives of his family members, and even complete strangers. David is truly a hero and embraces everything that a responsibly armed American should strive for. This is a story of a responsible gun owner that the Lamestream liberal media doesn’t want you to hear, which is why you won’t see it anywhere else. Please like and share to show America there are good gun owners out there! To get the same protection and peace of mind as David visit:http://bit.ly/2vkWOmJ
It his high time to educate a few people on exactly what “AR”means as it relates to semiautomatic rifles. This seems to be a recurring topic on internet message boards. Today a friend posted the following on Facebook:
“I was talking with one of our Deputy Sheriffs earlier at the local Chinese restaurant. I have known him for quite a few years, but he had a rookie with him today. The topic of firearms eventually came up and the rookie started talking about all the “assault” weapons on the street. When I asked what he meant he said the AK’s, .223’s etc. I asked what constituted an assault rifle…and he said anything with an extended mag.
I couldn’t contain myself, I know I have the right to remain silent…I just didn’t have the ability. I said…”How did you get a badge when you don’t even know the difference between a semi-automatic weapon and an “assault” rifle? Of course that was followed up by a detailed description of how both semi and full auto work, and the fact that assault weapons have been illegal for citizens to own since 1934.
When they got up to leave the rookie walked away, and I said to my friend…”Training this guy is gonna be a bear.” He said “Yeah, this one is a real dumbass.”
Modern Sporting Rifle Facts The modern sporting rifle, based on the AR-15 platform, is widely misunderstood. Why? Confusion exists because while these rifles may cosmetically look like military rifles, they do not function the same way. Also, groups wanting to ban these rifles have for years purposely or through ignorance spread misinformation about them to aid their cause.
The National Shooting Sports Foundation asks you to be an informed gun owner and to use the following facts to correct misconceptions about these rifles. Remember, that if AR-15-style modern sporting rifles are banned, your favorite traditional-looking hunting or target shooting semi-automatic firearm could be banned, too.
AR-15-platform rifles are among the most popular firearms being sold. They are today’s modern sporting rifle.
The AR in “AR-15” rifle stands for ArmaLite rifle, after the company that developed it in the 1950s. “AR” does NOT stand for “assault rifle” or “automatic rifle.”
AR-15-style rifles are NOT “assault weapons” or “assault rifles.” An assault rifle is fully automatic — a machine gun. Automatic firearms have been severely restricted from civilian ownership since 1934.
If someone calls an AR-15-style rifle an “assault weapon,” he or she either supports banning these firearms or does not understand their function and sporting use, or both. Please correct them. “Assault weapon” is a political term created by California anti-gun legislators to ban some semi-automatic rifles there in the 1980s.
AR-15-style rifles look like military rifles, such as the M-16, but function like other semi-automatic civilian sporting firearms, firing only one round with each pull of the trigger.
Versions of modern sporting rifles are legal to own in all 50 states, provided the purchaser passes the mandatory FBI background check required for all retail firearm purchasers.
Since the 19th century, civilian sporting rifles have evolved from their military predecessors. The modern sporting rifle simply follows that tradition.
These rifles’ accuracy, reliability, ruggedness and versatility serve target shooters and hunters well. They are true all-weather firearms.
Chamberings include .22, .223 (5.56 x 45mm), 6.8 SPC, .308, .450 Bushmaster and about a dozen others. Upper receivers for pistol calibers such as 9 mm, .40, and .45 are available. There are even .410 shotgun versions.
These rifles are used for many different types of hunting, from varmint to big game. And they’re used for target shooting in the national matches.
AR-15-style rifles are no more powerful than other hunting rifles of the same caliber and in most cases are chambered in calibers less powerful than common big-game hunting cartridges like the 30-06 Springfield and .300 Win. Mag.
The AR-15 platform is modular. Owners like being able to affix different “uppers” (the barrel and chamber) to the “lower” (the grip, stock).
And, they are a lot of fun to shoot!
According to Senator Dianne Feinstein, her looking at millions of pictures of guns makes her an authority on guns. If that’s the case, every teenage boy in America is a leading expert on gynecology.
Quote of the day by Dianne Feinstein:
“All vets are mentally ill in some way and government should prevent them from owning firearms.”
Yep, – she really said it in a meeting in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee… and the quote below from the LA Times is priceless. Sometimes even the L.A. Times gets it right.
Kurt Nimmo: “Senator Feinstein insults all U.S. Veterans as she flays about in a vain attempt to save her anti-firearms bill.”
Quote of the Day from the Los Angeles Times:
“Frankly, I don’t know what it is about California, but we seem to have a strange urge to elect really obnoxious women to high office. I’m not bragging, you understand, but no other state, including Maine, even comes close. When it comes to sending left-wing dingbats to Washington, we’re Number One. There’s no getting around the fact that the last time anyone saw the likes of Barbara Boxer, Dianne Feinstein, Maxine Waters, and Nancy Pelosi, they were stirring a cauldron when the curtain went up on ‘Macbeth.’
The four of them are like jackasses who happen to possess the gift of blab. You don’t know if you should condemn them for their stupidity or simply marvel at their ability to form words.”
Columnist Burt Prelutsky,
Los Angeles Times
Be sure to forward this to all of the “mentally ill” vets you know. Feinstein is the pot calling the kettle black.