Search

Deplorables Republic

Freedom of speech for a free people

Category

First Amendment

Insider Information: This Video Was Only for Facebook Employees

Insider Information: This video wasn’t supposed to be seen by anyone but Facebook employees.

The man who originally posted this video on his YouTube channel was threatened that it would be removed. We beat them to the punch and uploaded it on our Bitchute Channel, out of Facebook & Google’s reach, and out of YouTube’s control.

This video was originally intended to only be seen by Facebook employees, but when one of them objected to its contents, they posted it on YouTube. Now both Facebook, YouTube, & Google have threatened him

The video exposes Mark Zuckerberg’s intentions of using Facebook to help the Deep State Coup and propel the world into a one world government. We are asking all of you receiving this to share it everywhere you can, whether via your Facebook profiles (You may get suspended for posting it), but if everybody doesn’t help in this battle, we are all doomed. We simply MUST WIN the mid-term elections, and exposing Zuckerberg and Facebook to all Americans will do the job. Copy & Paste the title and link into an email and send it to all of your friends, just Share it EVERY WAY you can! 

Click on the bitchute link below to watch the video. When you have finished watching it, please Share or re-post the link all over the Internet!

DISPATCHES – INSIDE FACEBOOK: SECRETS OF THE SOCIAL NETWORK

https://www.bitchute.com/video/PyzU5MkI1Qf4/

National Call to ACTION! E-mail President Trump

National Call to ACTION!

Google, Facebook domination has RUINED the internet for everyone, warns EPIC report

http://bit.ly/2InternetMonopolies

Send President Trump an email and remind him that he has the power to initiate proceedings against these companies under the United States antitrust laws.

President Trump needs to pursue prosecution of of Facebook and Google under the United States antitrust law regarding monopolies

United States antitrust law is a collection of federal and state government laws that regulates the conduct and organization of business corporations, generally to promote fair competition for the benefit of consumers. (The concept is called competition law in other English-speaking countries.) The main statutes are the Sherman Act of 1890, the Clayton Act of 1914 and the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914.

These Acts, first, restrict the formation of cartels and prohibit other collusive practices regarded as being in restraint of trade. Second, they restrict the mergers and acquisitions of organizations that could substantially lessen competition. Third, they prohibit the creation of a monopoly and the abuse of monopoly power.

The Federal Trade Commission, the U.S. Department of Justice, state governments and private parties who are sufficiently affected may all bring actions in the courts to enforce the antitrust laws. The scope of antitrust laws, and the degree to which they should interfere in an enterprise’s freedom to conduct business, or to protect smaller businesses, communities and consumers, are strongly debated. One view, mostly closely associated with the “Chicago School of economics” suggests that antitrust laws should focus solely on the benefits to consumers and overall efficiency, while a broad range of legal and economic theory sees the role of antitrust laws as also controlling economic power in the public interest.

E-mail President Trump by clicking on the link below:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

Please Share, Re-post, or copy & paste this message in its’ entirety. If EVERY American reading this were to copy & paste this message into an email and send it to everybody on their email list and ask their recipients to do the same, it would reach everybody in America in about a week!

About Those Oh, So “Tolerant” Liberals…

Yesterday, a friend referred me to a Democratic message board called theDemocratic Underground.” I found a topic relating to several recent defeats of liberal policies, I cannot print here because of the profane title of the thread.

Suffice to say, (caption modified) it read; F*CK EVERYONE who did not vote for Hillary Clinton.

“I don’t care why you didn’t vote for her. I don’t care if you thought she was an oligarch or didn’t like her voice or her laugh or believed she wasn’t liberal enough or she just didn’t “inspire” you (what the hell is up with that anyway – are you 8 years old who won’t eat your pancakes unless they’re shaped like happy faces?). Unless you were too ill or otherwise physically incapable of voting or your vote was suppressed, f*ck everyone who did not vote for the only candidate who could have prevented what is happening to this country.”

There were multiple replies to the rant which stated that the respondent was either crying or trying to hold back the tears over their recent defeats. I felt obliged to sign-up on the message board and add my two cents in hopes of starting a cloudburst of tears, and did so without using emotional outbursts or profanity either one.

Unlike the above rant, my reply to it was succinct and lacking in profanity; yet it lasted only a few minutes until it was censored and removed and my profile banned from the message board. It said simply:

“Better Call the Wahmbulance!

Rough week for Democrats:

Lost every major Supreme Court decision.

Loses Kennedy who was a swing voter and supported gay marriage decision.

Maxine Waters calls for civil unrest.

Lost high ranking Dem. to socialists in NY.

Trump approval at all time high
And it’s only Wednesday
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) June 27, 2018″

No, the above meme wasn’t included in the comment because images aren’t allowed on the website, but the title of my comment said it all.

Almost daily since President Trump was elected. we see a constant barrage of comments by liberal pundits and the far left media stating that they fear losing “their democracy.” I’m here to tell you and them, we are not now, nor have we ever been a democracy. Hello? Lights are on but nobody seems to be at home at the Democratic plantation. Perhaps we should consider utilizing those FEMA camps they intended for us and use them as re-education camps for every liberal in the country? We could start with the introductory video below as a required course:

Why America is a Republic, not a Democracy

Remember back when Obama said the greatest threat to national security was right-wing extremist groups? Now we are faced with the specter of radical left-wing extremism and they are calling for a revolution. Nowhere in Obama’s wildest dreams did this ever take place under his administration, and nowhere ever did we see any “right-wing extremists” calling for a revolution. 

From February 21, 2015 9:40 AM As seen on Fox & Friends Weekend

“During his three day summit on Countering Violent Extremism, President Obama continued to reject the notion that the West is at war with radical Islam. So what does the Obama administration identify as the real threat?

According to reports leaked from the Department of Homeland Security, the real danger to U.S. national security isn’t ISIS or radical Islamic terror, but domestic right-wing extremists.

Dr. Sebastian Gorka said on “Fox and Friends Weekend” he couldn’t recall an instance in the last 20 years when right-wing extremists flew jumbo jets into buildings, set off bombs at a marathon or beheaded 21 Christian hostages.

“It really is the most egregious politicization of national security,” Gorka stated. “We’re going to be looking for right-wing extremists when ISIS prepares to attack us? It’s outrageous.” “

So where is DHS now? Why haven’t they issued any warnings about domestic radical left-wing extremists being a real danger to U.S. national security? Inquiring minds want to know.

I find it laughable that now the radical left is calling for violent revolution. They having been calling for decades to disarm the law-abiding American gun owners of their right to defend themselves, yet who is now calling for a violent revolution? NOT the NRA. NOT law-abiding gun owners, but the same liberal lunatics that are responsible for every mass-casualty shooting in the United States since 1982, if not all of the previous decades since Abraham Lincoln was assassinated.

I also find it interesting since my time in academia, that one of the concepts liberal educators talk about constantly is the art of “critical thinking.” Oh really? So why haven’t liberals done any critical thinking lately?

As an example of this foible, consider this:
I am trying to look at the “up side” of the left-wingers’ abortion issue.

I’ve always been against abortion, but…

Liberals are too stupid to realize it, but thanks to them, there are over 62 MILLION fewer liberals in the world than there would have been had they not aborted their own offspring.

It would appear to me they’ve lost their ability to think critically. If they had mastered the art of “critical thinking” they never would have passed Roe vs. Wade in 1973. After all, those 62 million babies born to liberal mothers would have given them the majority they needed to win the 2016 election. Now all they can do is cry over the milk and the blood they’ve spilled.

Control the moron population. Please spay & neuter your liberals!

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: