Search

Deplorables Republic

Freedom of speech for a free people

Tag

Elizabeth Warren

PROOF Liberalism is a mental illness

By Rusty Weiss posted by Admin

Presidential candidate, Rick Santorum, was the victim of a ‘glitter bombing’ in 2012, as he delivered remarks following a third place finish in the South Carolina primary.  Glitter bombing is a supposed act of protest in which opponents are showered with glitter by leftists who support same-sex marriage policies.  What exactly would cause grown men and women to perform an act that is seemingly drawn from the mind of a child?

In 2005, Michael Savage famously wrote a book titled, Liberalism is a Mental Disorder, the subject of which is self-explanatory.  And more recently, Dr. Lyle Rossiter, a board-certified clinical psychologist, wrote a book in which he diagnosed the ideology of the left as a tangible mental illness.  Perhaps though, liberalism is not so much a novel mental disorder, but a more cleverly disguised form of illness already widely studied since the late ‘60s – narcissistic personality disorder (NPD).

The Mayo Clinic defines NPD as “a mental disorder in which people have an inflated sense of their own importance and a deep need for admiration.”  This seems in tune with the fact that liberals, along with their degenerate offspring, the Occupy Wall Street movement, believe their policies and platforms fall in the majority – or the 99% if you will – despite being outnumbered by conservatives at a 2-1 clip.

There are other symptoms that define NPD and the left alike…

Expecting constant praise and admiration

This is a staple of the Occupy movement and their constant ‘look at me’ media whoring.  The need to feed their pride consumes them, fueling a self-importance that must continue to grow through perpetual media coverage.

Being jealous of others

The very premise on which the Occupy movement and the liberal platform of wealth redistribution are based is jealousy. They want what others have, and they want it without cost to themselves, either monetarily or based on time. They are envious of those with wealth, health insurance, homes, etc. It is a common attribute upon which all liberal protesters rally around.

Expecting others to go along with your ideas and plans

Is there anything that personified this more than the Obamacare fight?  The measure was opposed by likely voters by a wide margin, 54-41 percent.  Yet it was still rammed down the collective throats of the American people.  Why?  Because liberals honestly thought that once the plebeians had a chance to see their ideas, they would go along with it.  Proof of this materialized when Nancy Pelosi uttered these famous words:  “… We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it.”

Setting unrealistic goals

Those crazy kids over at the OWS website, at one point gave us a list of humorous demands that included these deep-seated liberal fantasies.

  • Guaranteed living wage income regardless of employment
  • Free college education
  • Open borders migration
  • Immediate across the board debt forgiveness for all

The liberal politician’s equivalent of this list would be:

  • Extending unemployment benefits ad nauseam
  • Student loan forgiveness
  •  Illegal immigration amnesty (DREAM Act)
  •  Postponement of foreclosures

All currently under consideration by the Obama administration.

A sense of entitlement

The liberal movement amounts to nothing more than making excuses to legitimize a platform of laziness and entitlements.  We see this in the Occupy protests.   Their solution to counter corporate greed is to steal from those that have worked hard to attain their level of wealth, and give to those who refuse to reach such a work ethic. Money for nothing, or entitlement, seems to be a birthright for the left.

Trouble keeping healthy relationships

Too easy.  Does this sound like a group of individuals with relationship issues?

Summary

All of these symptoms seem to define an individual who is unable to express their frustration in a rational manner – hence the glitter bombing.  The Mayo Clinic diagnosis seems to speak to the glitter-loving liberals directly: 

“In order to make yourself feel better, you may react with rage or contempt and efforts to belittle the other person to make yourself appear better.”

Problem being; only you believe these actions make you look better.

In the end, Savage was right.  Liberalism is a mental disorder.  Just not a new one.

Rusty can be contacted at The Mental Recession

H/T Newsbusters 

If you are an American CITIZEN who is opposed to the radical left-wing agenda, you are welcome to join us on our Facebook group. Our group is moderated and if you are a foreigner, you will be blocked.

Deplorables Republic Facebook GROUP Click HERE

Is Elizabeth Warren promoting Hillary’s “Civil War?” (With Video)

Is Elizabeth Warren promoting Hillary’s “Civil War?” It would appear that her inflammatory rhetoric, along with that of many other Liberals is calling for more violent protests.  These are the same people who accused Trump supporters of being violent all the while the only violence has been at the hands of radical left wingers. In what would seem a tactic right out of the Marxist handbook, Liberals are the ones committing the violence while deflecting calling Trump supporters violent. We’re here to tell you if we were violent, you would know it. It may come to that, but if it does we’ll put you down like the dogs that you are. We’re not into pussyfooting around when it comes to defending ourselves. You seem to forget we are the ones who own the guns, and he who owns the guns makes the rules. Don’t take your fists to a gun battle, you will lose.

Warren goes on to call the conservative right “bigots” when her own bigotry is on display in a manner that might just as well be a neon sign. There is no escaping her bigotry and intolerance. So much for Liberals being “tolerant and peaceful.”

What we’d like to know is since when is encouraging violence not a crime? By all other perspectives it would be considered sedition, if not treason.

From the Sedition Act of 1798: 

http://www.constitution.org/rf/sedition_1798.htm

SECT. 2. And be it further enacted, That if any person shall write, print, utter, or publish, or shall cause or procure to be written, printed, uttered, or published, or shall knowingly and willingly assist or aid in writing, printing, uttering, or publishing any false, scandalous and malicious writing or writings against the government of the United States, or either House of the Congress of the United States, or the President of the United States, with intent to defame the said government, or either House of the said Congress, or the said President, or to bring them, or either of them, into contempt or disrepute; or to excite against them, or either or any of them, the hatred of the good people of the United States, or to stir up sedition within the United States; or to excite any unlawful combinations therein, for opposing or resisting any law of the United States, or any act of the President of the United States, done in pursuance of any such law, or of the powers in him vested by the Constitution of the United States; or to resist, oppose, or defeat any such law or act; or to aid, encourage or abet any hostile designs of any foreign nation against the United States, their people or government, then such person, being thereof convicted before any court of the United States having jurisdiction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars, and by imprisonment not exceeding two years.

18 U.S. Code § 2385 – Advocating overthrow of Government: 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2385

Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or

Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or

Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

As used in this section, the terms “organizes” and “organize”, with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 2, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 87–486, June 19, 1962, 76 Stat. 103; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: